Clarifying responsibilities
I think we should respond by asking if the user wants a summary, specific details, or sources. It’s important to mention that I can check reliable sources if needed. However, I’m in an environment where I can’t browse the internet unless explicitly allowed, so it’s good to clarify that. I need to establish if network access is enabled for tasks that require it. I also have a sense of working within certain constraints.Providing context on eligibility

The user has made a simple request, so I want to clarify how I can help. I should ask if they want a summary, confirmation, context, or information related to eligibility rules. I can explain that in volleyball, teams can be disqualified if an ineligible player is involved, and this usually relates to age-group tournaments governed by FIVB or AVC regulations. It's important to avoid discussing specific individual attributes, focusing on general processes, and not making normative judgments. I want to keep things factual and neutral.Clarifying user needs
I want to clarify what the user is looking for. Should I verify details, cite sources, or provide a timeline? It's important to be concise and propose logical next steps. I can briefly explain concepts like "判负" and "取消参赛资格," as well as the potential appeal process and its impact on standings. I’ll avoid discussing any sensitive attributes about individuals. If I reference sources, I'll use phrases like "媒体报道称." I can also offer to search for additional information if the user wants that.
你想让我帮你核实这条消息、找权威来源,还是想了解这类判罚的规则背景?

规则背景(概览):
如果你需要核实并给出来源,请提供赛事名称(如亚洲/东南亚U21女排哪一站或哪届)、大致日期或一条新闻链接,我可以整理官方通告与主流媒体报道给你。